FCUK… FCUK what?

So unlike kim, I am just going to post things that I found quite interesting and I know are some what relevant to what we do in class.

Ever since the commencement of this class, again law school has perverted my views that everything is in some way related to what we are exposed to in class and school. As we have been looking into copyrights in music and video, what is creative and what is just dupicated… I found myself looking into trademarks also. What is a copyrighted trademark etc, and with the help of CC (yes I cited you) I came across this article:

www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=%5CCulture%5Carchive%5C200405%5CCUL20040521d.html

In class we briefly touched upon the topic of whether a person can copyright an acronym, I beleive Randazzo said that it was possible. Then I read this article and saw that it is, but due to what it could be mistaken as or read like, there seems to be a controversay about it. I did see that this is a lil old, but I am looking into what became of this… I shall post its out come as soon as I find out.

arvind galabya

Published in: on February 9, 2007 at 1:40 am

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://kimandarvin.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/fcuk-fcuk-what/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

One Comment Leave a comment.

  1. On February 14, 2007 at 6:11 pm Professor Randazza Said:

    I never told you that you can copyright an acronym! Where did you learn that?

    And… quick spelling test… how do you spell Prof. Randazza’s name?

Leave a Comment